Operation Moshtarak

Premature enthusiasm and premature talks

U.S. defense secretary Robert Gates deserves some credit for his fairly reasoned and non-triumphal public statements during this week's trip to Afghanistan. He warned against over-optimism in Afghanistan, stressing that there are "dark days" ahead and that the quick "clear" phase in Marja doesn't suddenly mean the war is won (or even that Operation Moshtarak is won).

In Now Zad yesterday, he commended soldiers and Marines for clearing the area of Taliban, but then said "you own it" -- and warned of a complicated path ahead.

Gates struck a far more cautious tone than many military commanders (and analysts, and journalists, and bloggers...). Good for him! One concern about his visit to Now Zad, though. From the New York Times:

Marines had cleared the area so thoroughly for Mr. Gates's visit, his first walk through a market during wartime in Iraq or Afghanistan, that only a smattering of vendors offered anything for sale. "Glad to see your shop's open," Mr. Gates told a merchant selling potatoes and eggs, who was surrounded by shuttered neighbors.

I understand the public-relations value -- or at least the perceived PR value -- of the defense secretary visiting Helmand province. It's also a morale boost for the troops in Helmand after a few weeks of hard fighting.

But if Gen. Stanley McChrystal's new strategy is all about population-centricity... well, shutting down an entire village for a photo op doesn't sound very population-centric, does it?

Meanwhile, away from the statements of U.S. officialdom, a few not-so-encouraging stories out of Afghanistan from the last few days.

  • Elders in Marja are angry about "looted shops, house searches, civilian casualties, arrests and instances of international forces using schools as military bases." They're also skeptical that the Afghan government will deliver basic services as promised.

  • Zabul province doesn't have nearly enough international troops. I'm of two minds about this: On the one hand, Zabul isn't a population center; it has an even smaller population, and a less dense population, than Helmand province. That said, if NATO's goal is to secure southern Afghanistan, Zabul demands more attention: It's just up the road from Kandahar, and it sits along the border with Pakistan's Balochistan province, making it a key transit point for the Taliban.

  • Finally, British foreign secretary David Miliband -- scheduled to deliver a speech on Afghanistan in Boston at 3:30 this afternoon -- reportedly wants Afghan president Hamid Karzai to accelerate his plans for reconciliation talks with the Taliban. I can't possibly see how premature negotiations will backfire!

We'll have more on Miliband's speech later this afternoon.

2 Comments

Aloha, Gregg... I enjoyed the Reuters account on Karzai's visit to Marjeh...

Karzai later told reporters: "They had some very legitimate complaints. Very, very legitimate. They felt as though they were abandoned, which in many cases is true. And this sense of abandonment has to go away."

He was joined at the meeting by U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, commander of U.S. and NATO forces which have seized most of Marjah in operation Mushtarak, which began last month and has been described as the war's single biggest offensive.

McChrystal sat on the floor during the meeting, listening to Karzai through an interpreter, but did not speak. He later put a positive spin on the angry words, telling reporters he was "impressed at how they went hard at the issues".

"To me, that's real democracy in action: people speaking their minds, and nobody seemed hesitant to do that," he said, adding troops would check claims of property damage or looting.


The passivity of Karzai's statement is funny -- "this sense of abandonment has to go away." No mention of the fact that his government is in large part responsible for this sense of abandonment...

Post a Comment

What's actually happening in Afghanistan?

The actual events on the ground are, frankly, not very encouraging. There are reports this morning that NATO forces killed civilians in a raid in Laghman province earlier this week. ISAF insists no civilians were killed; the Afghan government says 13 were killed.

Yet another Helmand surge

9,000 Marines will reportedly head to Helmand province as part of Obama's surge strategy. This will be at least the third or fourth time NATO has sent big surges to Helmand; past experience suggests that this one, too, will be woefully ineffective.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.