The Goldstone Report

U.N. General Assembly approves Goldstone resolution

The United Nations General Assembly voted overwhelmingly today to give Israel and the Palestinians five months to finish investigating the Goldstone Report's claims.

The final vote was 98-7; 31 countries abstained, and another 56 didn't bother to vote. The seven "no" votes were Canada, Israel, Micronesia, Nauru, Panama, Macedonia, and the United States. Most of the abstentions were European states (a full list of results is here).

The U.N. resolution gives Israel and "the Palestinian side" five months to finish investigating; as we noted earlier this week, it doesn't specify whether that demand is directed at Hamas or the Palestinian Authority.

Reactions were pretty predictable. In a short statement, Israel's ministry of foreign affairs said it has already published two reports about Goldstone's findings, and said it would continue its military investigation into possible war crimes committed during Operation Cast Lead.

Israel has already published two comprehensive reports relating to the Gaza Operation and the results of the investigations and their mechanisms. Israel, as a democratic country, will continue to conduct thorough investigations and to share the findings with its allies and with the UN Secretary General.

Israel will continue to exercise its right to defend its citizens, while maintaining the highest standards of moral behavior.

Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian observer at the United Nations, called the vote a "victory for the Palestinians and a victory for international law" -- because fewer countries voted "no" than did on the last Goldstone resolution, which was passed in November. He's right, though I'm not sure Mansour should base his argument on numbers: The number of "yes" votes also dropped, compared to November. (That resolution was approved 114-18, with 44 abstentions.)

Mansour also said the Palestinian Authority would conduct its own investigation of the report.

"We do not do so on the basis of any symmetry or proportionality between the Palestinian people under occupation and Israel, the occupying Power, for there is no equivalence whatsoever between the scope, scale, intensity and gravity of the Israeli aggression and crimes against our people and actions by the Palestinian side. Rather, those actions would be based on adherence to international law and the belief that such efforts would end Israel's culture of impunity."

Alejandro Wolff, the deputy U.S. representative to the United Nations, criticized the resolution and called the Goldstone Report biased.

We continue to believe that the Report of the UN Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, widely known as the Goldstone Report, is deeply flawed. We have previously noted shortcomings that include its unbalanced focus on Israel, the negative inferences it draws about Israel's intentions and actions, its failure to deal adequately with the asymmetrical nature of the Gaza conflict, and its failure to assign appropriate responsibility to Hamas for deliberately targeting civilians and basing itself and its operations in heavily civilian-populated urban areas. The Goldstone Report is also problematic in its many overreaching recommendations and its sweeping legal and political conclusions. The Report contains, as does the resolution just voted, a counterproductive recommendation to convene the High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention and an inappropriate attempt to press action on the Security Council.

Hillary Clinton, the U.S. secretary of state, made a similar argument yesterday in testimony before the House of Representatives. Clinton said the report would be "problematic" for the U.S. and other countries fighting asymmetric wars.

1 Comment

It's really the no votes that count. Israel lost 11 countries from the last vote on Goldstone, and was left without even a single member of the EU. They also lost Australia. Only the US, Canada and a handful of tiny islands stood with them. Israel is losing its strong backers at an alarming rate, especially since Israel has explicitly stated that they view Goldstone as an existential threat.

Post a Comment

Goldstone: Back on the U.N.'s agenda

The United Nations General Assembly will vote Friday on whether to give Israel and Palestine another five months to finish investigating the Goldstone Report's findings.

Barak: Preliminary Goldstone response sent to U.N.

Israel gave United Nations secretary-general Ban Ki-moon a response today -- but it's only a 40-page explanation of how the IDF investigated allegations of war crimes during Operation Cast Lead, and not the results of the investigations themselves.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.