The Goldstone Report

Report: Netanyahu will oppose independent Goldstone investigation

The Israeli government will not conduct an independent investigation of the Goldstone Report's findings, according to a report in the Jerusalem Post.

It's a single-source report, and it still hasn't been confirmed by the Israeli government. But an unnamed senior official in prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said Bibi is satisfied with the IDF's internal probe, the preliminary results of which were submitted to the United Nations earlier this month.

There's been a lot of internal debate over establishing a civilian investigation. Netanyahu reportedly favors (favored?) the idea, as do a number of prominent Israelis, including attorney general Menachem Mazuz and deputy prime minister Dan Meridor; the military establishment opposes it. If the Post's report is true, then it seems the IDF won that argument.

Why would Netanyahu back off? For one thing, as we've written before, Netanyahu is looking to avoid major political confrontation. He has a bunch of divisive issues on his plate -- Syrian negotiations, East Jerusalem settlements, the peace process, etc. -- so he's probably not going to push too hard on the Goldstone Report.

Fighting for an independent probe offers him very little political gain -- that is, unless he thinks it will prevent the United Nations from referring the Goldstone Report to the International Criminal Court. That doesn't seem likely right now: Human rights groups panned the IDF's internal investigation, but the official reaction from UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon was extremely vague. He seems more focused on restarting peace talks than advancing the Goldstone Report. And the General Assembly doesn't have Goldstone on its schedule.

The UN Security Council could refer Goldstone to the ICC without a General Assembly vote -- but that would require American support, which Barack Obama is unlikely to give. He certainly doesn't face much domestic pressure. AIPAC dismisses the report as a biased "denial of [Israel's] right to self-defense," and says the IDF is already doing enough (pdf) to investigate alleged war crimes. J Street takes a more nuanced position -- it doesn't call the report biased, and it wants an independent Israeli investigation, along the lines of the Winograd Commission -- but it doesn't want to see UN or ICC action, either.

And the U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in November to condemn the report.

So if there's no real pressure -- from Jerusalem, from Washington, from New York -- Netanyahu seems likely to let the issue drop.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Hamas under pressure to probe its Gaza war crimes

A coalition of Palestinian human rights groups wants Hamas to investigate its misdeeds during Operation Cast Lead, and Aharon Barak -- the former head of the Israeli supreme court -- wants the attorney general to investigate the IDF.

This week in war crimes

United Nations secretary-general Ban Ki-moon can't say whether Israel and the Palestinian Authority are on the right track when it comes to investigating the Goldstone Report's conclusions.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.