Operation Moshtarak

Whatever happens in Marja, Afghan civilians will suffer

If you go to Google News and search for "Marja," you'll find (literally) about 4,000 stories, most of which are rewrites of the same set of ISAF talking points: 20,000 NATO and Afghan troops are gearing up to attack the Taliban; Marja is the Taliban's last refuge in southern Afghanistan; the battle will be the most important military operation in eight years; etc., etc.

Very few of these bother to point out the inherent contradictions in Operation Moshtarak -- like the conflict between this enemy-centric offensive and NATO's stated population-centric strategy.

Josh Foust catches this bizarre press release from ISAF:

Despite reports of large numbers of civilians fleeing the area, the facts on the ground do not support these assertions. Current estimates are that fewer than 200 families have left Nad-e Ali since Operation Moshtarak was announced. Combined force commanders are encouraging civilians to remain in the safety of their homes. Every effort is being made to ensure minimum disruption to the residents during the operation.

As Noah Schachtman writes, the press release contradicts earlier statements from U.S. generals, who urged Afghan civilians to leave the town to avoid "getting caught in the crossfire." NATO planes have spent days dropping leaflets on Marja, urging people to leave.

And the "fewer than 200 families" figure is an absurd underestimate. Journalists and aid workers say tens of thousands of people in Marja have already fled. Al-Jazeera's David Chater traveled to one refugee camp outside Kabul, where he found hundreds of families, many of whom have fled the fighting in Helmand.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal has talked a lot about the importance of reducing civilian casualties, and commanders are saying all the right things about protecting the population. But "civilian casualties" is a limited metric: You can avoid civilian casualties by driving villagers from Marja, but if you force them to spend a freezing winter in squalid refugee camps, you're still probably going to lose their support.

ISAF clearly hasn't figured out which is the lesser of two evils -- hence the contradictory statements.

On the other side of the conflict, there's the Taliban, which is reportedly trying to prevent civilians from leaving the town. Civilian casualties breed resentment toward ISAF, so the Taliban has an incentive to cause them; Taliban fighters also want a civilian population to "blend into" when ISAF arrives. Una Moore flags this item from the Associated Press:

Villager Mohammad Hakim gambled that he could wait until the last minute because he was worried about abandoning his cotton fields.

He finally tried to move his wife, nine sons, four daughters and grandchildren out of Marjah earlier Tuesday but said militants told him to return home because they had mined the surrounding roads.

Local Taliban leaders have also promised not to fight "face-to-face," but rather to lay down their arms and wait for ISAF troops to leave Marja (h/t Spencer Ackerman). This is a message aimed largely at potential ISAF supporters among the civilian population: When your protectors leave, we'll take our revenge on you.

No Comments

Post a Comment

The Super-Hyping of Moshtarak

Why did NATO play up Operation Moshtarak? To give civilians warning, sure, but also to scare off a Taliban that wasn't interested in fighting an unwinnable battle, thus ensuring a public-relations victory.

Strategic communications, Taliban-style

ISAF has spent months hyping Operation Moshtarak as the mother of all battles. But why is the Taliban talking up the Marja offensive? To draw ISAF further into a battle that's likely to be expensive -- and unlikely to lead to any major strategic gains.

Suicide bomber kills 40 people in Lahore

Drone barrage reportedly targets Hafiz Gul Bahadur

Downplaying human rights to buy "cooperation"

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Fallout from Biden's visit: West Bank sealed off; proximity talks appear stalled

Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas greets U.S. vice president Joe Biden in Ramallah. (Photo: AFP)
As Joe Biden wraps up his Middle East tour, Palestinian officials say they're unwilling to move forward with proximity talks unless Israel cancels its new construction in East Jerusalem; and the Israeli Defense Forces have sealed off the West Bank for 48 hours, reportedly for security concerns. Several people were injured and arrested in fighting at the Al-Aqsa mosque this morning.

Peace Processing

Biden arrives in Israel amid serious Palestinian doubts

Vice President Joe Biden and his wife arrived in Israel on Monday.
As Joe Biden lands in Israel, the Israeli government -- obviously keen to demonstrate that it's serious about restarting peace talks -- announced Monday that it will violate its West Bank settlement freeze and build 112 new homes in Beitar Illit, a settlement west of Bethlehem.

Iraqi Elections

Polls close in Iraq; media reports suggest strong turnout, relative calm

An Iraqi man on a bicycle displays his ink-stained finger after voting in Baghdad on March 7, 2010. (Photo: AP)
A handful of insurgent attacks around the country killed two dozen people, but Iraqi security forces seemed generally confident; the vehicle ban in Baghdad, scheduled to last all day, was lifted before noon. Anecdotal reports suggest a strong turnout across the country.