Muslim Brothers

Don't expect Badie to change the Brotherhood

A couple of weeks ago I promised to write about Muhammad Badie's election as the Muslim Brotherhood's new supreme guide. I never did, mostly because I didn't have anything interesting to say; Evan has already written about the internal drama that surrounded the vote, and I don't think the election has much external significance, despite widely-publicized concerns that Badie (a conservative) will push the group to the right.

Why not? Shadi Hamid sums it up well.

Unlike many of its secular counterparts, the Muslim Brotherhood has never depended on individuals and personalities, but rather on strong organizational and institutional structures.

The Brotherhood is also under immense pressure right now from the Mubarak government, which has recently stepped up its campaign of harassments and arrests of Brotherhood members. At the same time, it reportedly offered the group a deal: reduced political participation in exchange for reduced harassment.

Whether or not the Brotherhood accepted the deal -- reports are inconclusive -- it's clear that Badie's organization will not play a large role in the next Egyptian election. Fawas Gerges gets some things wrong in his Brotherhood comment for The Guardian, but I think he largely gets this point right.

What this means is that in the next five years, the Brotherhood will be more preoccupied with increasing its membership, already more than a million strong, than lending a helping hand to the opposition to bring about peaceful change in Egypt. The new leadership will refrain from provoking the Mubarak regime which has recently cracked down hard on the Brotherhood and imprisoned hundreds of its members.

And to that end -- if the goal is not to provoke the regime -- the Brotherhood is not going to move too far to the right. Mubarak will tolerate the current Brotherhood, which has espoused non-violence for decades and adopted some fairly mainstream views. The government won't tolerate the group if it becomes significantly more conservative.

That's in the short term. In the long term, the Brotherhood wants to position itself for a bigger political role in a post-Mubarak world. But it is is already viewed with suspicion by many Copts and some secular/more liberal Egyptians; if it becomes more conservative, that suspicion will deepen.

So expect the Brotherhood's positions to remain largely unchanged -- because of both institutional inertia and self-preservation.

Side note: The Mubarak government, ever wary of the Brotherhood, has already congratulated Badie on his election by imposing a travel ban on him (عربي). State security says he's tried to conduct "organizational activities" for the Brotherhood overseas.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Erian: Brotherhood will run in all elections

Essam el-Erian promised that the Brotherhood will participate in all coming elections. Someone should tell Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, who last month proposed a 20-year boycott of Egyptian elections in order to focus on building the Brotherhood internally.

Crackdown on Muslim Brotherhood continues in Egypt

With elections for Egypt's lower house of parliament later this year, the government has stepped up its crackdown on members of the banned-but-tolerated Muslim Brotherhood, which took a fifth of the country's parliament in groundbreaking 2005 elections but has recently seemed to move away from political involvement.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.