Peace Processing

Erekat: About that statehood thing? Just kidding.

One thing to one audience, one thing to another. Saeb Erekat told the Jerusalem Post today that the Palestinian Authority is not, in fact, planning to unilaterally declare a Palestinian state.

"What we are asking the world to do is to specify the borders of the state as the 1967 border," Erekat said. "I want to make sure the Israeli people understand that we are not speaking of a unilateral declaration... this is not an option."

That would pretty clearly seem to contradict his interview with AFP this weekend, when Erekat said the PA wants "recognition of an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital and with June 1967 borders."

Erekat should really tell his boss, Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas, who reiterated today in Cairo (عربي) that he still plans to ask the U.N. Security Council to recognize the Palestinian state.

Abbas said the "harsh reality" in the region drove him to his current position.

After meeting with Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak, Abbas told reporters in Cairo that "the decision to declare an independent state is not a unilateral decision."

He said a resolution was issued by the Higher Arab Monitoring Committee after a recent meeting; the committee agreed to go to the Security Council and say that it supports an independent Palestinian state.

Abbas said Mubarak supported the PA's decision not to resume peace talks until Israel agrees to a full settlement freeze.

This is all probably a moot point: The U.S. and European Union both rejected the unilateral-statehood idea earlier this week, virtually ensuring it will die in the Security Council. It seems like a gambit designed to focus the Israeli mind, much like Erekat's suggestion earlier this month that the PA might have to ditch the two-state solution and push for one state.

If Bibi Netanyahu sees the alternatives, the thinking goes, maybe he'll be more amenable to peace talks.

Doesn't seem to be working, does it?

No Comments

Post a Comment

Erekat: Let's make it official

Saeb Erekat tells a Palestinian newspaper that the Palestinian Authority might push for U.N. recognition of a Palestinian state along 1967 borders, a move that would obviate the need for a formal Israeli settlement freeze.

Bibi only interested in 'final-status' negotiations

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu wants final-status negotiations with the Palestinian Authority, not half-measures like a provisional state or a settlement freeze, the Jerusalem Post reports.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.