Peace Processing

Erekat floats the one-state solution

U.S. media have spent the last 24 hours focused on Hillary Clinton's assertion that Israeli settlements are "illegitimate" (a rather insignificant statement, in our view).

Far less attention was paid to remarks by Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, who told reporters yesterday that the Palestinian Authority might have to start pushing for a one-state solution.

"Successive Israeli governments have destroyed any chance of reaching a two-state solution," Erekat said. "The Palestinian Authority must start searching for other options. A Palestinian state without Jerusalem as its capital would be meaningless. The Palestinian people haven't excluded other options, including the option of a one-state solution."

This is a negotiating tactic, and hardly a new one. Prominent Palestinians (and other world leaders, including Muammar Qadhafi) have raised the one-state solution in the past as a way of focusing the Israeli mind. (Most Israelis find a one-state solution totally unacceptable.)

So I'm not surprised that Erekat raised the idea at this juncture, with peace talks basically dead.

Nonetheless: Benjamin Netanyahu should probably pay attention this time. Erekat isn't the first prominent figure to talk about one state. Jordan's King Abdullah, in an interview last month, said the possibility of a two-state solution would disappear at the end of 2010. There's a growing sense that Israel only has a limited window of opportunity left to sign a two-state deal.

A majority of Palestinians still support two states, but that won't last forever -- not with the PA weakened, Netanyahu intransigent, and Obama increasingly viewed as just another biased American president. If the two-state "peace process" doesn't start yielding results, soon, Palestinians might well decide it's not worth pursuing.

1 Comment

I think the PALs should consider this option very seriously. in fact it should be the only option. I can not see Israel able to tolerate an independent capable Pal state next to it.

Post a Comment

Sharp dressed man

Where does Qadhafi shop?

Translating Mr. Qadhafi

Muammar Qadhafi did a one-on-one interview with Al-Jazeera's Ghida Fakhry in which he called for a one-state Israeli-Palestinian solution and repeated his call for Security Council reform.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.