Live-blogging: Senate hearing on Iran sanctions

10:44 a.m.: I'm not getting anything out of this hearing. The witnesses are not going to go into much detail in a public hearing, and the senators don't know much about Iran.

I'll update if anything interesting happens, but for now, consider the live blog done...

10:40 a.m.: Shelby wants to know if an Iranian nuclear weapon would be "transferred to terrorists." I have to say, when it comes to Iran's nuclear program, this isn't one of my big concerns. The weapon would be pretty quickly traced back to Iran, which would then face a massive retaliation.

10:38 a.m.: Steinberg points out that there's a difference between unilateral U.S. sanctions and international sanctions. He suggests that the former will be poorly received by the Iranian public. (As if they'll endorse international sanctions?)

10:32 a.m.: James Steinberg, the deputy secretary of state, is talking about "milestones" for Iran -- essentially goals the U.S. wants Iran to achieve in order to avoid sanctions. He said the two main benchmarks are allowing the IAEA full access to the Qom facility on Oct. 25, and agreeing (not just in principle) to ship uranium to Russia for further enrichment.

10:18 a.m.: The witnesses are giving their opening statements, and frankly they've said nothing of interest yet.

10:02 a.m.: Sensible proposal from Schumer: He wants to send more inspectors to the U.A.E. to enforce sanctions on Iran. You'll remember the UAE recently intercepted a shipment of North Korean weapons bound for Iran.

9:59 a.m.: Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) says economic sanctions are "the most effective" means of checking "Iran's nuclear ambitions." I'd like to see some data to back up this claim.

9:53 a.m.: Over-under on the first Hitler/Nazi Germany reference? I give it 45 minutes.

9:49 a.m.: Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kansas) is talking about a new bill he introduced that creates a divestiture program. It would allow state and local governments to divest from businesses in Iran, or businesses that do business with Iran.

Brownback says it's modeled on the divestiture programs created for Sudan and South Africa.

9:47 a.m.: Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) just said he prefers economic sanctions to "the alternative, which we may have to pursue in the future." I love how casually these guys talk about bombing another country.

9:45 a.m.: More opening statements. Everyone thinks dialogue shouldn't be open-ended."

9:35 a.m.: Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), the committee chairman, just cited this weekend's NYT report as "proof" that Iran is closing in on a nuclear weapon. The report, of course, was full of holes.

Original post: The U.S. Senate Banking committee is meeting this morning to discuss possible economic sanctions on Iran. Hearing's supposed to start at 9:30 a.m., though it's running a little late. We'll have live coverage.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Congress will press ahead on Iran sanctions

The basic storyline is that senators -- Republicans and Democrats alike -- don't think Iran will negotiate in good faith, and they want the administration to be ready to impose sanctions on Iran. Soon.

Berman's odd sense of time

Howard Berman cautions that Iran 'could soon have humankind's most frightening weapon.' But most experts say it will be years before the Qom facility is capable of producing highly-enriched uranium.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.