Scare quotes

The New York Times writes up Ali Akbar Salehi's press conference under the headline Iran Insists on Its 'Rights' to Nuclear Program. I'm not quite sure why we need the scare quotes there. Iran has a right to a nuclear program. Period. It doesn't have a right to a nuclear weapons program, but then Salehi isn't asserting that right. (Whether the Iranian government is pursuing one is another question entirely.)

1 Comment

Here's directly from the text of the NPT:

1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with articles I and II of this Treaty.
Here's George Perkovich, from your link that Iran has a right to a nuclear program.
Iran, like all countries, has a right to “develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes…in conformity with Articles I and II of the Treaty” Under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, Iran can expect international cooperation in exercising such rights.
Perkovich skipped "without discrimination", and only those two words. Was he really that pressed for space or is he trying to avoid what "without discrimination" implies? Because Japan and Brazil reprocess or enrich and in both cases could make a political decision to make weapons with technology and materials in the country now. I'm not sure how Perkovich claims Iran does not have a right to enrich if this right applies without discrimination. But even worse, why snip it out? Why not face the fact.

Just pointing this out.

Post a Comment

Will Salehi bring change?

It's true that Iran cooperated with the IAEA during Salehi's tenure. Salehi wasn't the reason for that cooperation, though; it came from then-president Mohammad Khatami, who took a political risk by working with the IAEA.

Nuclear family

It's always difficult to know what's really happening inside Iran's opaque political system. With that caveat, let's try to unpack two articles about the changing leadership of Iran's nuclear program.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.