US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.
1 Comment
Here's directly from the text of the NPT:
Here's George Perkovich, from your link that Iran has a right to a nuclear program.Perkovich skipped "without discrimination", and only those two words. Was he really that pressed for space or is he trying to avoid what "without discrimination" implies? Because Japan and Brazil reprocess or enrich and in both cases could make a political decision to make weapons with technology and materials in the country now. I'm not sure how Perkovich claims Iran does not have a right to enrich if this right applies without discrimination. But even worse, why snip it out? Why not face the fact.Just pointing this out.
Post a Comment