Secret Centrifuges

Berman's odd sense of time

I didn't get my hoped-for John Bolton op-ed this weekend (at least not in any newspapers I read), but I did get this op-ed from Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) urging harsh sanctions on Iran. It begins with this gem:

Tehran could soon have humankind's most frightening weapon if substantial diplomatic progress is not made in the coming days.

Berman and I obviously have a different definition of "soon."

The Qom facility isn't operational yet, and it's not expected to go online for another 18 months. Once it does, it will take many months to refine enough highly-enriched uranium (HEU) for a nuclear weapon. Remember, this is a small facility: It contains just 3,000 centrifuges, enough to produce (at most) two weapons' worth of HEU per year.

In order to produce that HEU, Iran will have to transfer large quantities of uranium to the facility. The IAEA would almost certainly detect such a large transfer.

Even if Iran manages to enrich HEU for a bomb, other not-inconsequential challenges remain, like the delivery system. It's one thing to have highly-enriched uranium. It's another thing entirely to put that uranium into a warhead and fit it on top of a missile.

Josh Pollack, writing at Arms Control Wonk, strikes the right tone:

Simply put, there is no credible explanation for the existence of the Qom facility--as described by Western officials yesterday--that doesn't involve the option to produce future production of HEU-based nuclear weapons.

This makes sense. The facility is probably military in nature -- for a longer treatment of this question, see Spencer Ackerman, who interviews several experts and concludes the facility is "being constructed to support a nuclear weapons program." But it is years away from actually producing a nuclear weapon.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Iran sends IAEA final offer, but what does it say?

Saeed Jalili, Iran's top nuclear negotiator, has delivered Iran's final response to the draft IAEA proposal unveiled last month. But there seems to be a bit of confusion about what, exactly, Iran said.

IAEA reports on Iran, Syria

We've uploaded the IAEA's latest reports on Iran and Syria. Iran is still stonewalling on possible military applications of its nuclear technology, according to the IAEA, and Syria refuses to talk about the Deir az-Zor facility.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.