Shifting Alliances

Forcing Maliki out of his job

Well, well. Interesting news out of Iraq this morning, where the Washington Post reports that prime minister Nouri al-Maliki will not be part of a proposed coalition government of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq and Moqtada al-Sadr's political party. But how significant is this?

Let's begin with a caveat: This ISCI-Sadr alliance hasn't actually happened yet. It could very well fall through; the two parties have clashed in the past, for example in Najaf, where Sadr's group has tried to build its influence and undermine ISCI. Or the alliance could hold and Maliki's Dawa party could join it. Such was the rumor last month, when Sadr said he was considering an alliance with both parties.

That said, if this report is true, it suggests two things about Maliki: The other two Shi'ite parties view him as a liability, and he's still confident about his own position.

The latter claim first: Maliki thinks he's in a strong position because, during his tenure, American troops left Iraqi cities and violence dropped precipitously. He has spent months linking himself to those trends -- billing June 30 as the day of glory, etc. -- and he thinks that Iraqi support for the U.S. withdrawal (or, more accurately, resentment for the occupation) will propel his Dawa party to success in January.

Maliki is reportedly refusing to join the Sadr/ISCI alliance because the other parties won't promise him the prime minister's job if the coalition wins a majority. So he's gambling on, essentially, an all-or-nothing strategy: Either he builds an alternative coalition and wins a sizable bloc, or he winds up a marginalized member of a minority party.

But the other Shi'ite parties obviously don't see him that way. In part that's because of worrisome recent trends: Violence is flaring around the country, particularly in Baghdad, northern Iraq, and Anbar province. They're also reluctant to promise him the prime minister's spot -- denying that post to members of their own parties.

1 Comment

Sadrists still "undecided"

Post a Comment

Moqtada's travels

Moqtada al-Sadr is visiting Arab countries, and he is rumored to be considering a coalition with the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq.

Sadrist movement to join coalition

Al-Sharq Al-Awsat has the first confirmation I've seen that Moqtada al-Sadr's party wants to join the Shi'ite alliance announced yesterday.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.