Settlements and the English language

Newsweek has details on how a Republican pollster in the United States is helping The Israel Project sell Americans on Israeli settlements.

How do you sell the American public on the idea that Israel has the right to maintain or even expand Jewish settlements in the West Bank? Be positive. Turn the issue away from settlements and toward peace. Invoke ethnic cleansing.

Obviously, rumors of the Israel lobby's demise are greatly exaggerated.

But I actually think Luntz's verbal gymnastics are a symptom of a larger problem: Public discussion about the settlements -- in government, in the media -- is horribly muddled.

As George Orwell memorably put it, "[Language] becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts."

So we talk of "illegal outposts" in the West Bank, rarely stopping to note that all of the settlements are illegal under international law. We fret about "ethnic cleansing," as if it's genocidal to force a few young settlers to leave Gush Etzion because they can't build new houses there. We make no mention of the millions of Palestinians who have been forced from the territories, and from Israel proper, over the last sixty years.

Even the term "settlements" is something of a misnomer, conjuring up images of Israelis bravely staking their claim to the untamed, uninhabited wilds of the West Bank (a "land without a people," even).

On a related note, this blog has a lengthy document released this winter by The Israel Project. It explains how supporters should "sell" the Gaza war (h/t Saba Imtiaz). One of their top strategies? Keep repeating the phrase "Israel wants peace."

1 Comment

Gregg - the manual is definitely worth a thorough read. Their 'suggestions' mirror what the official Israeli and American stance was during the Gaza war: ready-made soundbites for spokespeople to defend atrocities.

Post a Comment

Report: U.S. approves settlement construction

That's the report from the Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv, which claims the Obama administration agreed to allow Israel to finish construction on 2,500 buildings in the West Bank.

Biden: Bomb Iran, see if we care

Did Vice President Joe Biden on Sunday signal America's acquiescence to an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear power, or was he just being frank?

Juan Cole throws cold water on Iran nuke threat; police chief warns protesters

Condemning the House of Jonathan

Today in AQAP: Jihad with a chance of Awlaqi

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Nuclear Negotiations

More nuclear posturing from Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking Sunday at the Exhibition of Iran Laser Science and Technology.
During a speech on Sunday, Ahmadinejad ordered the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Agency to figure out how to enrich the country's uranium to a more easily weaponized level. Some doubt that Iran even has the capability to carry out such enrichment, but the country's leaders likely hope that Ahmadinejad's remarks will give them leverage in negotiations with the West.

Helmand Surge, Take 5

Strategic communications, Taliban-style

ISAF and Afghan soldiers on patrol in Helmand province last year. (Photo: Flickr user combat.camera)
ISAF has spent months hyping Operation Moshtarak as the mother of all battles. But why is the Taliban talking up the Marja offensive? To draw ISAF further into a battle that's likely to be expensive -- and unlikely to lead to any major strategic gains.

Iraqi Elections

Report: De-Ba'athification decision overturned

Iraqi president Jalal Talabani at a press conference in Baghdad (file).
An Iraqi appeals court has overturned the de-Ba'athification commission decision that banned 766 candidates from Iraq's March 7 parliamentary election. The court's ruling does say that the once-banned candidates will be subject to judicial review -- for Ba'ath links -- if they win the election.