The Palestinian election deadline

An interesting take from The Arabist on why Egypt is abandoning its push for a Palestinian unity government:

... having Palestinian reconciliation now necessarily means presenting the Obama administration with a unity government they are not able to accept (although they should) for domestic political reasons, i.e. the Israel lobbies (I think AIPAC and J Street would sing to the same tune here)... the entire US push for a Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) would fall apart.

That seems a plausible scenario and a smart reading of the behind-the-scenes politics.

But I can't say I share The Arabist's guarded optimism that some kind of reconciliation is possible after the 2010 election. Hamas and Fatah haven't even agreed on a framework under which to hold the elections: Should they use the Oslo Accords? The Cairo Agreement? Hamas will be reluctant to participate under any framework that gives the PLO too much authority.

And as this IFES report (pdf) points out, the framework needs the support of not only Hamas and Fatah but Israel and the "international community."

Once that's decided, the PA will need two or three months to prepare for the election -- printing ballots, selecting officials for polling stations, etc. So Hamas and Fatah need to agree on a political framework by mid-November -- at the latest -- to meet their goal of holding an election on January 24.

That's not impossible, especially if Egypt keeps mediating some kind of dialogue between the two parties. But I'm not terribly optimistic.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Hamas: No deal on Oct. 25

Hamas will not sign a reconciliation deal with Fatah on October 25, as originally planned. The group has asked for a delay of several weeks because of Mahmoud Abbas' decision to delay the Goldstone Report.

No reconciliation

Hamas will not sign the reconciliation deal that Fatah agreed to yesterday. Fatah is again threatening to unilaterally call for elections in January.

Condemning the House of Jonathan

Today in AQAP: Jihad with a chance of Awlaqi

This week in war crimes

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Nuclear Negotiations

More nuclear posturing from Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking Sunday at the Exhibition of Iran Laser Science and Technology.
During a speech on Sunday, Ahmadinejad ordered the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Agency to figure out how to enrich the country's uranium to a more easily weaponized level. Some doubt that Iran even has the capability to carry out such enrichment, but the country's leaders likely hope that Ahmadinejad's remarks will give them leverage in negotiations with the West.

Helmand Surge, Take 5

Strategic communications, Taliban-style

ISAF and Afghan soldiers on patrol in Helmand province last year. (Photo: Flickr user combat.camera)
ISAF has spent months hyping Operation Moshtarak as the mother of all battles. But why is the Taliban talking up the Marja offensive? To draw ISAF further into a battle that's likely to be expensive -- and unlikely to lead to any major strategic gains.

Iraqi Elections

Report: De-Ba'athification decision overturned

Iraqi president Jalal Talabani at a press conference in Baghdad (file).
An Iraqi appeals court has overturned the de-Ba'athification commission decision that banned 766 candidates from Iraq's March 7 parliamentary election. The court's ruling does say that the once-banned candidates will be subject to judicial review -- for Ba'ath links -- if they win the election.