Bibi rejects peace with Syria

A banner week for the Netanyahu administration, really. First we learned that Bibi is somewhat paranoid about the Israeli media, and that he thinks Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod -- two of Obama's top advisers -- are "self-hating Jews."

Then he told Germany's foreign minister that the West Bank can't become "Judenrein," the Nazi term for an area cleared of Jews. This prompted a stunned nod from the foreign minister. (I guess the Israeli/Palestinian conflict has dragged on long enough that Godwin's law now applies?)

And now we learn his administration wants to keep "much" of the Golan Heights in any peace agreement with Syria.

In an interview that shored up the contradictions in Israel's foreign policies, National Security Adviser Uzi Arad told Israel's Haaretz newspaper the Jewish state plans to withdraw from some areas in the Golan Heights, Syrian land captured in the 1967, but intends to remain in the strategically key areas.

The Syrian government has insisted for decades that a peace deal has to include the full return of the Golan Heights. A group affiliated with the government recently threatened war over the territory. And there's the little matter of international law: The Golan is occupied territory, not part of Israel proper; Israel still needs to return it under the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242.

And Netanyahu's still hoping for a peace deal that only returns part of the Golan.

One other observation from the Al-Arabiya article.

Netanyahu has said he is ready to hold peace talks with Syria without preconditions, but that any agreement must address Israel's security needs.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Netanyahu already laid out two preconditions? Keeping part of the Golan Heights is one. Security is the other; a perfectly sensible one, of course -- Israel would be crazy to accept a peace deal that doesn't include some guarantees on Syria's relationship with Hamas and Hizballah -- but a precondition nonetheless.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Self-hating

Akiva Eldar, writing in Ha'aretz, has a smart take on Benjamin Netanyahu's suggestion that Obama's advisers (David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel) are 'self-hating Jews.'

Netanyahu: Syria's flexible with the Golan

Has the Syrian government suddenly reversed decades of standing policy and dropped its demand that Israel agree to return the Golan Heights as a precondition for peace talks? Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu thinks so.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.