The Egyptian military goes shopping

The Jerusalem Post's Yaakov Katz has a bizarre article about the Egyptian military trying to purchase Russian-made air defense systems. Katz claims -- without a shred of evidence -- that Egypt is buying the weapons, S-300 and S-400 missile systems, as protection against a possible Iranian attack.

I'm not a military expert -- but this sounds fishy to me.

Egypt might be worried about other threats from Iran -- Hizballah sleeper cells, for instance. But I can't imagine the Egyptian military is concerned about a missile attack. If Iran launches missiles at anyone in the region -- a big "if" -- they're not going to shoot them over Israel and towards Cairo. That makes no sense.

So why is Egypt buying these weapons? There's the obvious answer, offered by The Arabist: Egypt is just bolstering its defenses against its traditional enemy (read: Israel).

But there's also this interesting paragraph buried in the article:

Iran has also been trying to acquire the S-300. Russian officials told Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman during his recent visit to Moscow that if Israel wanted to stop the sale it would need to buy the system in place of Iran or find an alternative customer.

Is Egypt the "alternative customer"? Remember, if Israel is planning a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, it has an incentive to keep the Iranians from acquiring air defense systems. So is the Israeli government quietly encouraging Egypt to buy these missile systems?

That would serve a dual purpose: It prevents Iran from buying the weapons, and it allows Israel to further hype the Iranian threat -- even Egypt is afraid of a potential Iranian attack!

No Comments

Post a Comment

Scare quotes

Iran has a right to a nuclear program. Period. It doesn't have a right to a nuclear weapons program, but then the regime isn't asserting that right.

Mossad vs. Mousavi

The head of Mossad says it's better for Israel to have Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power. But that conclusion doesn't make sense, because Israel is unlikely to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities with a military strike.

Condemning the House of Jonathan

Today in AQAP: Jihad with a chance of Awlaqi

This week in war crimes

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Nuclear Negotiations

More nuclear posturing from Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speaking Sunday at the Exhibition of Iran Laser Science and Technology.
During a speech on Sunday, Ahmadinejad ordered the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Agency to figure out how to enrich the country's uranium to a more easily weaponized level. Some doubt that Iran even has the capability to carry out such enrichment, but the country's leaders likely hope that Ahmadinejad's remarks will give them leverage in negotiations with the West.

Helmand Surge, Take 5

Strategic communications, Taliban-style

ISAF and Afghan soldiers on patrol in Helmand province last year. (Photo: Flickr user combat.camera)
ISAF has spent months hyping Operation Moshtarak as the mother of all battles. But why is the Taliban talking up the Marja offensive? To draw ISAF further into a battle that's likely to be expensive -- and unlikely to lead to any major strategic gains.

Iraqi Elections

Report: De-Ba'athification decision overturned

Iraqi president Jalal Talabani at a press conference in Baghdad (file).
An Iraqi appeals court has overturned the de-Ba'athification commission decision that banned 766 candidates from Iraq's March 7 parliamentary election. The court's ruling does say that the once-banned candidates will be subject to judicial review -- for Ba'ath links -- if they win the election.