The Egyptian military goes shopping

The Jerusalem Post's Yaakov Katz has a bizarre article about the Egyptian military trying to purchase Russian-made air defense systems. Katz claims -- without a shred of evidence -- that Egypt is buying the weapons, S-300 and S-400 missile systems, as protection against a possible Iranian attack.

I'm not a military expert -- but this sounds fishy to me.

Egypt might be worried about other threats from Iran -- Hizballah sleeper cells, for instance. But I can't imagine the Egyptian military is concerned about a missile attack. If Iran launches missiles at anyone in the region -- a big "if" -- they're not going to shoot them over Israel and towards Cairo. That makes no sense.

So why is Egypt buying these weapons? There's the obvious answer, offered by The Arabist: Egypt is just bolstering its defenses against its traditional enemy (read: Israel).

But there's also this interesting paragraph buried in the article:

Iran has also been trying to acquire the S-300. Russian officials told Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman during his recent visit to Moscow that if Israel wanted to stop the sale it would need to buy the system in place of Iran or find an alternative customer.

Is Egypt the "alternative customer"? Remember, if Israel is planning a military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, it has an incentive to keep the Iranians from acquiring air defense systems. So is the Israeli government quietly encouraging Egypt to buy these missile systems?

That would serve a dual purpose: It prevents Iran from buying the weapons, and it allows Israel to further hype the Iranian threat -- even Egypt is afraid of a potential Iranian attack!

No Comments

Post a Comment

Scare quotes

Iran has a right to a nuclear program. Period. It doesn't have a right to a nuclear weapons program, but then the regime isn't asserting that right.

Mossad vs. Mousavi

The head of Mossad says it's better for Israel to have Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in power. But that conclusion doesn't make sense, because Israel is unlikely to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities with a military strike.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.