Iran and Israel

Biden: Bomb Iran, see if we care

When a politician speaks, is everything single word important? Well, when the message is intricately crafted and calibrated by teams of PR handlers, probably.

Thus, the New York Times today takes a sentence from Vice President Joe Biden's Sunday talk show appearance and turns it into a potentially momentous proclamation: The U.S. won't stand between Israel and Iran if Israel wants to attack their nuclear facilities.

"Look, we cannot dictate to another sovereign nation what they can and cannot do when they make a determination -- if they make a determination -- that they're existentially threatened and their survival is threatened by another country."

The Times notes Biden's proclivity for frank speech, but also says that Biden didn't take host George Stephanopolous' opportunity to step back from his remark. I would also point out that Biden might be throwing Israel a bone - without OKing attacks - because the Obama administration has been so tough on settlements.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Backing away from Biden's remarks

I don't think Biden was giving Israel a green light to attack Iran, but his remarks have the potential to complicate U.S. foreign policy.

Unhelpful Avigdor

Avigdor Lieberman makes a totally unhelpful comment about Joe Biden's remarks on Israel attacking the Iranian nuclear program.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.