Iranian Elections

"Nobody wants to die."

Scattered images and video appeared on the Web on Saturday as what appeared to be a police crackdown took effect. There were reports of killings, tear gas and an apparent, though unconfirmed, bombing. (Image: BBC Persian video)

Huffington Post blogger Nico Pitney says he got an e-mail from someone in Sweden who says the Iranians around him are "desperate" in the wake of Khamenei's speech.

My girlfriends' parents in Tehran say they think people will give up. Nobody wants to die, with families still remembering the 1979 revolution and the Iran-Iraq war. But it all depends also on Moussavi-Kathami-Karroubi-Rafsanjani and what they will say. Are they ready to wage war to the country?

The great fear now is that Iran could be headed for another Tiananmen Square. Khamenei's words seemed to give sanction to violence against anyone who keeps protesting - will the opposition simply give up?

Here's Gregg's report from earlier today:

Ayatollah Khamenei's Friday prayer speech hit the pro-regime trifecta. He demanded an end to the protests; he reaffirmed his support for Ahmadinejad; and he tried to blame the protests on Western interference.

He also issued a not-so-veiled threat to the protesters:

"Rioting after the election is not a good way. It questions the election. If they continue [the consequences] will be their responsibility."

"If they continue they will be receiving other consequences, behind the scenes. I'm asking my friends and brothers to follow the laws. Let God give us blessing to follow those ways."

The Guardian has a rough transcript of the speech. I can't find any concessions to the protesters -- any recognition that they have legitimate grievances. He took a very hard line.

The speculation in the last couple of days has been that Khamenei's speech would be a harbinger of whichever new direction events in Iran would take. If he expressed ambivalence, then he might be willing to play ball with Mousavi. If he condemnded the protesters, then things would look very bleak - and that's what he did.

There are hard-liners in charge of the judiciary and intelligence apparatus, not to mention Ahmadinejad and his allies in the Revolutionary Guards and baseej. They'll be the ones on the front line of any crackdown, and they won't have much sympathy for the protesters.

What could keep the movement alive now? It's hard to say. Mousavi's spokesman has said, according to Twitterers, that Mousavi is 20 percent free and 80 percent under arrest, meaning, I'm guessing, that his movements are largely restrained by police. Should he, Rafsanjani, Khatami and others take to the streets with their supporters in direct affront to Khamenei? Part of me feels that may be the only way to sustain the opposition, if Khamenei's words do indeed indicate that patience in the regime has run out.

No Comments

Post a Comment

Ahmadinejad declares victory

The Iranian state news agency says he won the election with 65% of the vote; his main opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, is expected to dispute the results and claim fraud.

Rebuking Khamenei

Former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani sent a warning to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran, warning him about some comments president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made during a televised debate.

B'Tselem: Settlements occupy 42 percent of West Bank

Ben-Eliezer makes "secret trip" to Turkey: Israeli TV

CENTCOM talking sense on Hamas and Hizballah

Al-Akhbar: Our weekly brief

Peace Processing

Talking about direct talks: Netanyahu returns to the White House

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivering a statement in Jerusalem on July 1, 2010. (Photo: AFP)
US president Barack Obama will use a White House meeting with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to push for an extended West Bank settlement freeze. If Netanyahu doesn't offer one - and the domestic politics are quite difficult for him - it's hard to see any possibility of direct talks with the Palestinian Authority later this year.

The Afghan Surge

Obama's southern strategy

Gen. David Petraeus testifying on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Reuters)
The president's decision to nominate Gen. David Petraeus as the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan won't mean a major change in strategy. But there are mounting reasons for pessimism about current policy, particularly the relentless focus on southern Afghanistan. The deployment of tens of thousands of additional troops to Kandahar and Helmand serves few NATO objectives.

Freedom Flotilla Killings

Anticlimax: How much did the flotilla raid really change regional politics?

A demonstration in London against the Israeli attack on the Gaza-bound flotilla. (Photo: AFP)
It has accelerated Israel's isolation from several of its neighbors and allies; it has sharpened divisions within Turkish domestic politics; it has deepened perceptions that the Obama administration as too close to Israel. And it seems to have had a remarkably minor impact on Palestinian domestic politics.